From: "Bobby Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It would be one thing if SAGE was just a distribution of software, > with a package management system. But SAGE contains (lots) of code > that wraps these libraries and provides a unified interface to them. > I'm fairly confident that this falls under the GPL's concept of > 'linking'.
That's not exactly clear (at least for me). Anyway - it seems mostly a theoretical problem. From practical point of view, if SAGE would use different FSF licences for different parts of it, it seems impossible that, say, PARI, or GAP, would sue it for that. Axiom - maybe (just a joke :), but it doesn't seem to be a part of SAGE. Alec --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
