> In fact, I would much prefer choosing a 3rd party project for indexing > html docs and including it in SAGE to writing our own, since maintenance > will be easier, and the quality will steadily improve with no work on > our part. Any ideas or suggestions??
I agree. I won't volunteer for this task. >> In this vein, I have a soon-to-be-submitted patch that gives SAGE an >> apropos command. If you type `conductor**?', SAGE will list all >> (callable) objects with conductor in the last dotted name segment >> along with short docstrings: > > Nice! I am cleaning the code for submission, it should be along shortly. > I'm a little unclear on what you're proposing exactly. I'll have to think > about it. I just used the new notebook -- it totally roxors -- and I will try to find a few examples of what I think should happen and elaborate. Let's not think about this right now. Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
