[S-mailx] On obsoleting *signature*

[Steffen Nurpmeso]

Hello list.

While working on the ArchWiki as a last thing before i turn away
for some time i have found that mutt(1) supports command execution
for that one (via the "normal" "blabla|" pipe indication).

Now i wondered (just in case he reads this, maybe Dirk-Wilhelm
Peters *also* referred to this possibility in February, eh?!,
2016??) whether i should implement this too, but then again i said
no because of the possibilities the newly introduced hooks offer.
So i now have introduced a new `readall' command and some more
subcommands and possibilities for `vexpr' and wonder why

  define t_ocl {
    vput ! message-inject-tail cat ~/.mysig
    if [ $? -eq 0 ]
       vput vexpr message-inject-tail trim-end $message-inject-tail
    end
  }
  set on-compose-leave=t_ocl

or

  define t_ocl {
    readctl create ~/.mysig
    if [ $? -eq 0 ]
      readall message-inject-tail
      if [ $? -eq 0 ]
        vput vexpr message-inject-tail trim-end $message-inject-tail
      end
      readctl remove ~/.mysig
    end
  }
  set on-compose-leave=t_ocl

or

  set on-compose-splice-shell="read version; cat ~/.mysig"

or

  wysh set on-compose-splice-shell=$'\
     read version;\
     i=`cat .mysig`;\
     echo \'~:set message-inject-tail=\'\"${i}\"'

should not be enough.  I have obsoleted *signature*.

Ciao, and a nice rest-summer when your country supports that!

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)