Ciao Predrag! Predrag Punosevac <[email protected]> wrote: |Walter Alejandro Iglesias <[email protected]> wrote: |> I gave s-nail a try, and I like it to the point I'm thinking in leaving |> mutt, which I've been using since years. I'll mention some issues (and |> some criticism) based on this version (s-nail packaged by OpenBSD):
|git clone --single-branch https://git.sdaoden.eu/scm/s-nail.git |cd s-nail |make all WANT_READLINE=yes |make install Or WANT_EDITLINE=yes, that is still possible in v14.8.8. |UTF support on OpenBSD significantly improved recently (not that I use |UTF) so I would run the latest 5.9 current snapshot and the latest |s-nailrc before making any conclusions. The NCL does handle multibyte absolutely correct. And as long as you don't use double-width characters or place more characters on the visual line as the terminal can place in its input queue anything is just fine. The MLE is an improvement. |> It came out that s-nail doesn't recognize comments (prefixed by #). I'd |> assumed they are accepted netrc syntax since fetchmail, lftp, ftp, msmtp |> and other network applications I use haven't ever complained about them. |What is netrc? Is that some kind GNU thing? | |predrag@oko$ uname -a |OpenBSD oko.bagdala2.net 5.9 GENERIC.MP#2 amd64 |predrag@oko$ man netrc |man: No entry for netrc in the manual. It is usually documented for ftp. Now that i look, GNU doesn't document comments either. Nonetheless, i'll add them, i didn't know that. |I could care less for POP support but one of the reasons I could never |make myself switch to NMH (true original alternative to UNIX mailx |unlike mutt) is lack of IMAP support (of course NMH uses superior mh |mail format which is different than maildir and mbox which makes adding |IMAP support very cumbersome). New mailbox types not before v15. It simply doesn't make sense to implement something that possibly needs to be changed completely again. |IIRC Steffen's plans IMAP support my be indeed soon gone and I will I will really try to reinstantiate it for v14.9. Then a long time will pass. Huhu. --steffen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j __________________________________ [email protected]
