I apologize for being hostile. As Florian has noted, we're just arguing about the default behavior here. It is my opinion that checked behavior by default will make Rust unsuitable for filling C++'s niche, and send the message that we are not serious about performance.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Evan G <eg1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think I was ever "Railing against the incorrectness of overflow > semantics"? I was just pointing out that your (imo pretty hostile?) message > about "If you don't require absolute speed, why are you using Rust?" > doesn't really ring true. Most C++ programmers don't even require absolute > speed. >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
