On 20.09.2013 22:35, Benjamin Striegel wrote: > As usual, I'm highly resistant to use of the backtick because Markdown > uses it pervasively. Not only would this make it very annoying to embed > Markdown in strings, it can make it impossible to embed inline Rust code > in Markdown editors. Let's leave the backtick as a metasyntactic symbol.
I am not so sure the markdown argument stands, because it is only an issue in `inline code blocks` really. Blocks fenced with ``` or 4-space indents can contain backticks just fine, and can typically do in bash scripts. In inline blocks, you can always escape them with \` which sure isn't as nice, but I find it rare to have much more than alpha-numeric identifiers in inline blocks. Cheers -- Jordi Boggiano @seldaek - http://nelm.io/jordi _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
