On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Martin Wawrusch <mar...@wawrusch.com>wrote:

> Thanks a lot. I really needed some assurance that this is the right
> direction.


Sure, post back if you have any issues. One thing which I had some trouble
with was that by default your principal application will load before the
engine. This is a problem if you have, say, a model in your engine which you
are intending to extend in your primary app and not the other way around.
There is a way around this but just be aware.

>
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:48 PM, David Kahn 
> <d...@structuralartistry.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Martin Wawrusch <mar...@wawrusch.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I am rather new to the rails world and need your help in pointing me to a
>>> good sample project and/or some hints how best to implement it.
>>>
>>> I have implemented an API section for a website of mine that deals with
>>> API Key management and want to publish parts of it as a gem so that it can
>>> be easily used it in other projects. This consists of controllers, views,
>>> some mongoid models, some coffeescript code, some scss. In a way it is a
>>> mini application with replaceable parts.
>>>
>>> What is the recommended way in Rails 3 to implement this in a gem so that
>>> it is reusable and future proof (Rails 3.1 comes to mind). Should I look
>>> into rails engines? Do you know of any samples that implement best
>>> practices?
>>>
>>
>> I just worked on a project which makes use of an engine. Although I did
>> not create it I went through a decent amount of work to get it to play nice
>> with the main app. It sounds to me that an engine would be the right thing
>> as it handles including controllers, views, models, etc. If you google for
>> rails engine I see that there are a number of results including a railscast
>> which would be where I would start.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to