On Apr 3, 2:57 pm, Alexey Muranov <[email protected]> wrote: > I know this, my question is specifically about naming files where the > classes are defined. > In particular, if it is possible to define > > class KnownIPsController < ApplicationController > end > > in a file named "known_ips_controller.rb". > > I suspect that the answer is "No".
For what it's worth you can declare any class in any file - however if you don't put classes where rails expects to find them then it won't be able to magically load them for you > Should the route be > match "see" => "known_i_ps#show" > or > match "see" => "known_ips#show" > in this case? The routing bit and the class loading bit aren't really related (in that it doesn't matter what routes exist, when automatically requiring a file for you rails wants known_ips_controller.rb to define KnownIpsController) Fred > > None works, the errors are, respectively, > uninitialized constant KnownIPsController > and > Expected .../test_app/app/controllers/known_ips_controller.rb to > define KnownIpsController > > Alexey. > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
