Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #976394: > Interesting. I had "rails s" work out of the box on a new Ruby > 1.9.2/Rails 3 installation (granted, this was on Mac OS, not Windows). > I'd use Passenger if Mongrel and Thin didn't work, but I still see > little point in bothering with it for development if the lighter-weight > alternatives function. (I can't see how having Nginx is an advantage > unless you're actually doing Nginx redirects and such.)
I use passenger standalone for the following reasons: 1. It's not WebBrick. 2. It's not Mongrel (i.e. it wasn't created by Zed Shaw). 3. I've never tried Thin. 4. It's dead simple to install. 5. It's just as easy to launch as anything else. 6. For at least some of the reasons listed here: http://www.modrails.com/documentation/Users%20guide%20Standalone.html -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
