> So there is never any ambiguity about timestamps in the database. For > example, suppose you move to a server in another timezone, it can get > very messy if you have timestamps in EST or whatever happens to be > your local timezone today. By keeping all timestamps in the db in UTC > you will always know what they mean.
I understand the benefits of UTC, however... > Normally Rails will do the > conversion to local time for you so the fact that it is UTC in the db > is not something you need normally worry about. This is the reason why I noticed. I have to display on screen the date and time from updated_at and I saw that while my local time was around 4:00 PM the screen was displaying around 9:00 PM. In other words, there is no 'conversion' going on. I don't know if it makes a difference but when I display the values I am not displaying the full value of updated_at, I have to break it down in 2 values, date and time, and I am using strftime to do the job. Should I be using something different and/or converting the values to local time first somehow? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.