On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser <[email protected]> wrote: > Who knows? I can't speak for the core team. My guess -- and it *is* a > guess -- is that it's because the Rails core team has a bad case of Not > Invented Here syndrome in some respects. This is nicely fed into by the > assumptions of many Rails developers that the core team's decisions are > perfect and needn't be questioned.
No, I just don't see a reason to throw away a perfectly good and working Test::Unit integration in favor of a separate Rspec for purley academic reasons. They do the same thing. The assertions do the same thing. The main difference is one requires more syntax to do the same work. Maybe one day the Rails core team will be as smart as you and switch to Rspec, until then.. -- Greg Donald destiney.com | gregdonald.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
