Your right. I could not deal with the additional table. Thanks for the insight.
John Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > John Mcleod wrote: >> Thanks for the quick reply. >> >>>But having two tables with identical structure is smelly. Why not just >>> use a flag and a named_scope? >> I'm not sure what you mean by this. > > Then go look up named_scope -- or, in this case, default_scope. > >> >> Yes, both tables have the identical structure but my idea is too delete >> all data from the "import" table after the insert into the "projects" >> table. This way the user has a fresh table to get info from a csv file. > > There's no reason to have a fresh table. Again, just flag records as > appropriate. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koser > http://www.marnen.org > [email protected] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
