Thanks to all for your replies. All very good.
As I mentioned in my reply to Fred, I ended up using STI for this.
Without knowing it is pretty much what I was doing manually. The built
in functionality allows me to not have to do the final 'find' by hand
and retrieves the record through the correct model by itself, hence
having the correct functionality.
I almost went back to the original idea and column name in table
'users' (category) after I started to run into problems trying to
update the value of column "type" the 'regular' way:
my_user.type = 'whatever'.
That gave me some trouble until I finally remembered about:
my_user[:type] = 'whatever'
and cruised through.
I still have a part of the code that is not as dry as I think it
should. When I am updating a user and the type changes I am running
the following code in the controller:
# This work for all the attributes but 'type', which does not get
updated.
@user = User.update(params[:id], params[:user])
# That is why I ended up having to run the following right after
the line above.
if @user.errors.empty?
@user[:type] = params[:user][:type]
@user.save
end
I chose to go this way route because I was it was shorter and easier
than anything else I could think of. If there is a better way of doing
this I'd appreciate a comment on it.
Thanks to all.
Pepe
On Jul 12, 10:43 am, pepe <p...@betterrpg.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found what I think is a slick solution to a problem of mine but I'd
> like to know if there is a better way to accomplish what I did.
>
> I have 2 tables:
>
> Users:
> id
> category # can be either 'ADMIN', 'AUDITOR' or 'TENANT'
>
> Audits:
> id
> auditor_id
> tenant_id
>
> I need the audits to belong to both an AUDITOR and a TENANT user:
>
> class User < ActiveRecord::Base
> has_many :audits
> end
>
> class Audit < ActiveRecord::Base
> belongs_to :user # !!! This does not work even using :class_name,
> etc. !!!
> end
>
> After tinkering for a while with it I couldn't find an easy way of
> making it work. Then I had an idea that has worked and I think is
> pretty slick. I created 3 models:
>
> class Admin < User
> # Admin specific functionality here
> end
>
> class Auditor < User
> has_many :audits
> # Auditor specific functionality here
> end
>
> class Tenant < User
> has_many :audits
> # Tenant specific functionality here
> end
>
> When a user is retrieved for access and functionality validations, I
> re-retrieve the user through the specific user class as in:
> user = User.find(...)
> # The user is found and passes validations.
> # Now I re-retrieve it through the specific user class based in the
> category value.
> user = user.category.capitalize.constantize.find(user.id) if user
>
> From that moment on I have the user retrieved through its correct type
> and my associations work wonderfully.
>
> Is there a better way of making this work?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Pepe
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
