Älphä Blüë wrote: > Has anyone developed extensive projects with HAML and SASS and is it > worth the effort to convert and utilize those markup languages?
Absolutely (in particular if you use the Haml >2.1.0 or the haml-edge gem)! Haml is basically HTML with less typing. Sass is a really, really powerful way of abstracting your CSS, allowing for clearer, more semantic markup by eliminating the need for presentation classes. I highly recommend them both. For an example of what you can do with Sass if you're really going all out, check out Chris Eppstein's Compass project (I believe that's http://www.compasscss.org ) > > The reason why I ask is I'm getting ready to dive down into my views and > work with CSS and the HTML and I'm trying to find ways to improve upon > my coding.. Then Haml and Sass will be very useful. Among other things, Haml makes it very hard to do Bad Things in HTML. And of course you needn't exclusively decide on one or the other. I have a few projects where for one reason or another, I use both Haml and ERb. Now if someone would only make Kwartz work with Rails 2... > > Thanks. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
