Robert Walker wrote: > Phlip wrote:
>> To prevent users from editing the same record, do what Wikis do. Send >> out one >> form with a timestamp. When the POST comes back, compare the timestamp >> to the >> record's current stamp. If it has changed, inform the user they should >> use the > Is there some reason to go through all this trouble with using > timestamps? Why not just use optimistic locking? I'm not saying this > isn't necessary, I'm actually curious of any advantage of using > timestamps. Fail open instead of fail closed? But I am more concerned about Chris's reply - I can't figure out the question... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
