Thanks botp and Frederick ~
On Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 1:29:32 AM UTC-5, bot Peña wrote:
>
>
> belongs_to (and other assocns) has options for class name and foreign
> key. see ri or doc.
> otoh, i wonder if it would have been easier to create just another Worker
> resource (and probly delete Person); but ymmv prolly.
>
> best regards --botp
>
I added *class_name: "Worker", foreign_key: "worker_id" *to both Person and
Offer, so the class definitions look like:
class Person < ApplicationRecord
has_many :offers, class_name: "Worker", foreign_key: "worker_id"
end
class Offer < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :person, class_name: "Worker", foreign_key: "worker_id"
end
but the forms still misbehave as described earlier.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/40b8235b-aec6-4a67-a478-c3aac51855c4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
