Hello, In the DCI principle, I like the Roles. It enable to have a skinny model with a single responsability (the persistence of the data).
I don't like the context. It can be useful for some specific cases like in this article : http://mikepackdev.com/blog_posts/24-the-right-way-to-code-dci-in-ruby. But I don't want to have something like this : https://github.com/randx/rails-dci-example/blob/master/app/controllers/documents_controller.rb. It's too complicated for nothing. I have an alternative here : https://gist.github.com/GCorbel/5699834. It use service objects with roles. I think it's the best of both worlds. What do you think? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CABfX5PbfeiSrvdN0O3uczXh%2BBxsX2HBFx7pdc%3DTDxxcA%2BVchtA%40mail.gmail.com?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.