Hmm thanks. Is it worth it to report this to the Rails team?

On Monday, June 3, 2013 5:17:37 PM UTC+2, Rick wrote:
>
> I just noticed that your error does, in fact, appear in my output.  
> However, if I run inside of the rails console I don't see the redundant 
> "Here".  i.e.:
>
> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 659 > rails c
> Loading development environment (Rails 3.2.13)
> irb(main):001:0> c = Campaign.new
> => #<Campaign id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil, recurrence_id: 
> nil>
> irb(main):002:0> c.recurrence = Recurrence.new
> => #<Recurrence id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>
> irb(main):003:0> c.save!
>    (0.1ms)  begin transaction
>   SQL (5.1ms)  INSERT INTO "recurrences" ("created_at", "updated_at") 
> VALUES (?, ?)  [["created_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11 UTC +00:00], 
> ["updated_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11 UTC +00:00]]
> Here
>   SQL (0.5ms)  INSERT INTO "campaigns" ("created_at", "recurrence_id", 
> "updated_at") VALUES (?, ?, ?)  [["created_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11 
> UTC +00:00], ["recurrence_id", 1], ["updated_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11 
> UTC +00:00]]
> Here
>    (49.1ms)  commit transaction
> => true
> irb(main):004:0> c
> => #<Campaign id: 1, created_at: "2013-06-03 15:15:11", updated_at: 
> "2013-06-03 15:15:11", recurrence_id: 1>
> irb(main):005:0>
>
> My guess is it's a "test mode" artifact of some kind.
>
>
> On Monday, June 3, 2013 11:13:26 AM UTC-4, Rick wrote:
>>
>> I cannot duplicate your error running your github example.  Here's what I 
>> see:
>>
>> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 656 > rails --version
>> Rails 3.2.13
>> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 657 > ruby --version
>> ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24 revision 39474) [x86_64-darwin12.3.0]
>> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 658 >  ruby -Itest test/unit/campaign_test.rb
>> Run options:
>>
>> # Running tests:
>>
>> [1/1] CampaignTest#test_create_a_campaign_with_recurrenceHere
>> Here
>> Finished tests in 0.195217s, 5.1225 tests/s, 0.0000 assertions/s.
>> 1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
>>
>> ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24 revision 39474) [x86_64-darwin12.3.0]
>> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 659 >
>>
>> On Monday, June 3, 2013 1:55:29 AM UTC-4, Michel Pigassou wrote:
>>>
>>> Help?
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 7:39:30 PM UTC+2, Michel Pigassou wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I created an app to illustrate my problem: 
>>>> https://github.com/Dagnan/rails_inverse_of
>>>>
>>>> I have a model with a belongs_to, and the other with a has_one. So far 
>>>> so good.
>>>> When I configure the option inverse_of on both model and I perform a 
>>>> simple #save on the main object, it is actually saved two times (once 
>>>> saved 
>>>> and then updated).
>>>>
>>>> *Is it an expected behavior?*
>>>>
>>>> A way to avoid this problem would be not to use inverse_of, or to have 
>>>> "autovalidate: false" in the second model (Recurrence in my example) for 
>>>> the has_one association.
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/6e59fec1-161b-4ae6-bb3a-2e7f09438291%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to