Frederick Cheung wrote in post #1074851: > On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 12:56:05 AM UTC+1, Ruby-Forum.com User > wrote: > Controller specs bypass your routes entirely (as part as action invocation > goes, they're still used if you try to generate a url inside the > action). > If you do > > get :action_name > > then it will invoke that action with a get request, whether there's a > route > for it or not. > > post '/login' > fails because there are is no '/login' action (but there is a 'login' > one). > > If you write an spec request spec (or a rails integration test) then > get/post are the rack test methods instead which do take actual paths. > > Fred
If I'm getting what you say, in a controller spec it's not really important if I use get, post, delete or put methods - unless the action itself has some logic affected by the request type, right? :) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
