> Thanks for the tip about ultrasphinx, but i would like to know if its > possible to do opposite, to make it work with lexemes. Like for > example if you look for run, you will find run, runs, ran and running. > All of these words are forms of the same lexeme: RUN
hmm, I don't know about "ran" but if you enable star search, then ru* wil at least find run, runs, and running. This may be possible too, but I can't say for sure, since I didn't need this kind of search Maybe have a look at the docs: http://www.sphinxsearch.com/docs/current.html#searching > > I dont wanna be troll or blame the plugins, i heard a lot of good > things about thinksphinx, not so good things about ultrasphinx and > almost nothing about tsearch, that for me is working fine, except that > some developers here comes with the questions: "if i type "te" it dont > bring me my "test" post and ultrasphinx does". But well in real world > users wont search for "te" and if they search for te, they will find > everything like te,teahupo, tea, teta, tendency, etc, etc, etc. > lo, I agree. It was hard enough to read through lots of tutorials and documents. We started with ultrasphinx at some time back and it worked good enough for our needs. For new projects I would think about changing that to thinksphinx. Especially if I expect the index to be combined from several tables. But for basic search both should do well enough. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
