On Sep 29, 8:42 am, Peter De Berdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2008, at 05:00, ChessMess wrote:
> Back in the days where Rails incorporated the javascript helpers,
> jQuery was nowhere near P&S. Also, Prototype has a Ruby-esque syntax,
> in the RUBY on rails context I find this a very valid choice. If
> you're only using the Javascript helpers within Rails, it shouldn't
> matter to you whether it uses Prototype, JQuery, YUI, Dojo, … The
> Rails code will be exactly the same. If you're used to writing your
> Javascript code yourself, there's nothing holding you back from using
> another library in your Rails app, just don't count on the Javascript
> helpers anymore (or use the jrails plugin if you really have to).
>
All true. In my opinion if you've just using the helpers to generate
code, it doesn't make the blindest bit of difference whether that
helper is generating JS that uses prototype or scriptaculous. And if
you're writing the code yourself (which you should to get the most out
of the either of them - rjs is a crutch) then which one Rails ships
with doesn't make the blindest bit of difference.
Fred
> Best regards
>
> Peter De Berdt
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
