Thank you for your reply! Will be waiting for reviews. On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 3:37:48 PM UTC+3, DHH wrote: > > Thanks for all your work on these PRs, Vlad. Reviewing them, though, > doesn't seem to me like they were ignored. Lots of discussion and back and > forth on all of them. > > A good baseline assumption when a framework or feature in Rails isn't > seeing specific updates for a while is that it's doing what it needs to do > for the people who originally contributed. I wrote a bunch of the original > code with Pratik and Matthew, but now it Just Works for my needs, so I've > directed my personal attention elsewhere. That doesn't mean the project is > abandoned, just that there's an ebb and flow in many open source > contributors bandwidth for specific projects or features. Since these > tickets saw the majority of their interaction, we've pushed hard to get > Rails 5.1 out, which included a bunch of other things. So that's where a > lot of the energy went. > > In terms of plans, I don't think there's anything more specific for Action > Cable than for any of the other frameworks. We keep working, keep > improving. But PRs need reviews, which means bandwidth from senior > contributors in a position to apply that. Doubly so if the changes are > large. And that bandwidth will, as described above, wax and wane. > > I see that Kasper was the last Rails core contributor to help with the > reviews. He's just shipped encrypted secrets and the form_with unification > for Rails 5.1. So maybe he'll have more time to pick this back up with that > out the door. But it would be great to have more eyes on the reviews as > well. Open invitation to anyone who's interested in diving in and > understanding Action Cable. > > > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 8:05:07 PM UTC+1, Vlad Dem wrote: >> >> Hi, everyone! >> >> I'm wondering are there any plans on future Action Cable development? >> >> A lot of work has been done in the last two years (mostly bug fixes, >> server optimizations). >> But we're still on the same page as two years ago from the API point of >> view, in spite of the number of feature requests and even pull request >> <https://github.com/rails/rails/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Aactioncable> >> . >> >> We still don't have testing utils (although I've proposed PRs: #23211 >> <https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/23211> – more that a year ago! >> – and #27191 <https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/27191>). >> >> Action Cable looks like an abandoned *child*. Yes, it's still a *child*. >> There is a lot of questions to discuss and work to do. >> >> But I came here not to complain. I want to offer my help in Action Cable >> development (looks like proposing changes thru PRs not working), 'cause it >> looks like the core team doesn't have time to maintain the *sub-project* >> (or you got a *secret plan*, kind of "Action Cable 2.0"?). >> >> I'm already working on Action Cable related projects, such as AnyCable >> <http://anycable.io> and Lite Cable <https://github.com/palkan/litecable> >> (which >> is a result of my work (still unmerged PRs) on Action Cable *translated *for >> non-Rails projects). But the development of these projects highly depends >> on Action Cable itself. That's why I'm here) >> >> Thank you. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
