>From those 2600 routes, Typus gem generated +1800 routes, I'm sure I can reduce some obsolete routes from my code, but Typus generates a lot of routes because admin users have actions to handle most of the models on the project and I can't do much about that.
El viernes, 9 de septiembre de 2016, 13:39:28 (UTC-3), Jason FB escribió: > > Why do you need 2600 routes? > > It sound like your design is the flaw here. An app shouldn't have 2600 > controllers, maybe you've mapped content directly to controllers? I'd > recommend re-thinking that decision and sending the majority of those > requests to a single controller, and then let it decide what content to > show based on the params or based on part of the path string. > > You would only need 2600 routes if you also had 2600 controllers (hard to > believe) and *each controller had different Ruby functionality*. > > If you basically have 2600 different routes routed to the same Ruby code, > then you aren't using Rails correctly. > > Using the routes table just to segregate your *content* is an abuse of > the Rails router itself, as you really should be using routes to segregate > *functionality*, not content. > > -Jason > > > > > > > On Sep 9, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Ariel Juodziukynas <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > I have a project with +2600 routes, the error page takes almost 2 seconds > to load because it renders the _route partial +2600 times (sums up almost > 1.5 seconds of the total time) and most of the time the table is not really > needed if you are familiar with the code. > > An option to disable the routes table will be greate to improve speed of > development for those like me that doesn't really need that table. > > I would be happy to add that option myself, but I don't know where to put > it, I only know that, with that config value, I have to add a check in > rails > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1> > /actionpack > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1/actionpack> > /lib > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1/actionpack/lib> > /action_dispatch > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch> > /middleware > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware> > /templates > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates> > /rescues > <https://github.com/rails/rails/tree/52ce6ece8c8f74064bb64e0a0b1ddd83092718e1/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/rescues> > /routing_error.html.erb:19 > <% if confg.render_routes_table and @routes_inspector %> > > Any advise on it? any reason not to do it? thanks! > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > ---- > > Jason Fleetwood-Boldt > [email protected] <javascript:> > http://www.jasonfleetwoodboldt.com/writing > > If you'd like to reply by encrypted email you can find my public key on > jasonfleetwoodboldt.com (more about setting GPG: https://gpgtools.org) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
