## *Usage*
For testing purposes I'd say it would be useful to have `#where_values_hash` return the `not` conditions too in either: * a separate method (`#where_not_values_hash`), * by modifying the currently returned hash's structure from `#where_values_hash`. ## *Relevant code parts* Current Rails 4.2.5 implementation - https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/4-2-5/activerecord/lib/active_record/relation.rb#L560 Current Rails 5.x.x implementation - https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activerecord/lib/active_record/relation/where_clause.rb#L48 ## *Examples* Example that returns `not` conditions in `#where_values_hash` : ```Ruby > User.where(active: true).where.not(name: 'joe').where_values_hash => {"positive" => {"active": true}, "negative" => {"name": "joe"} } ``` Example that returns `not` conditions in new method `#where_not_values_hash`: ```Ruby > User.where(active: true).where.not(name: 'joe').where_not_values_hash => {"name": "joe"} ``` ## *Closure* If you agree with this idea, I'll gladly work on a PR. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
