So are you saying project.documents.reload.first would redo the query to find the associated record, or would do a find(id) to reload the current instance?
> On 16/07/2015, at 01:08 , DHH <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd prefer to see us move to a single API, and IMO the trade-offs for #reload > alone fits the bill. There's no contract saying that a singular object from > has_one/belongs_to and a collection like has_many has to behave the same. In > fact, I think it'd be strange to think that it should. A single string and an > array of strings do not behave the same. > > So project.documents.reload.first makes perfect sense to me as reloading the > documents collection, then grabbing the first one. projects.owner.reload.name > makes sense to me as reloading the owner record itself, then fetching the > name (if we don't already return self from Record#reload, we should). > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core > <http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
