I've just been getting re-acquainted with Rails 4 after spending the past 
year working in some other frameworks.

One thing I noticed are strong parameters which I see as a really great 
addition!  One flaw I've noticed however is in the behaviour of 
`params.require` which I don't think is 100% user friendly yet.  The two 
major issues I can see are:

 - It returns a value, when really what it should be doing is returning 
params to continue with a fluent API
 - It doesn't accept multiple values (an array)

It's been observed in the strong params github issue tracker by several 
others that this violates the principle of least astonishment by coupling 
unrelated functionality (returning nested keys) with the enforcement of 
parameter presence.  It also could be argued that people might expect to be 
able to use it as follows:

    my_params = params.require(:one, :two, :three).permit(:one, :two, 
:three, :four)

This basically sets up a simple request-specific schema for parameter 
presence as it begins to travel further into the application's layers.  I 
think the feature of params.require being able to verify the presence of a 
key and then returning it's contents for nested attributes needlessly couples 
two pieces of functionality.  I typically store all attributes for a 
request at the root of my `params` and so I never have any nested object 
data to dereference.  It's all at the top, and this results in me having to 
make multiple separate calls to `params.require` just to verify each one. 
 Which as I'm sure you can guess gets very ugly, very quickly:

    params.require :one
    params.require :two
    params.require :three
    my_params = params.permit :one, :two, :three, :four

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to