I have some similar feeling along your words "associations API is only partially a finder API", but can't say exactly what is not right. Why caching matters, and in case of caching why can't we just return cached object or raise?
As for singular/plural mismatch, differences in their interfaces are due to their nature, they already contain lots of examples of this divergence. On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 1:10:36 PM UTC+3, Xavier Noria wrote: > > Another mismatch is that a bang method would not translate to plural > associations. > > All in all, I am inclined to suggest that your action should just return > an ordinary 404 (not even raise an exception). > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
