On Monday, August 6, 2012 5:23:46 AM UTC-7, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote: > > Then you could possibly have 5,000 gems in > the Ruby world that actually contain no Ruby code at all, except for the > plugin glue code that could be different for each web framework. > > All of that just to make it easier for users to use a JS > library/framework. >
+1, I see this as a mild abuse of rubygems. There are already naming conflicts. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/Swvjzocjq7wJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
