I don't get why you're doing :class_name in the routes. I think the :as should be there. :class_name is more an ARec thing.
On 24 May 2010 08:16, Michael Koziarski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Shouldn't form_for be keying off of ":as => :thread" and using > > threads_path/thread_path instead of forum_threads_path/ > > forum_thread_path ? > > No, not as currently designed and implemented. The mapping from > instance to route helper name is done without consulting the routing > definitions at all, it's driven entirely off the class name and a few > simple conventions. This has the downside that you get the errors > that you're seeing now. But there's also the upside that you can have > those helpers call routes defined in ways other than resources. e.g. > manually connecting posts to a URL then using form_for @post. > > > -- > Cheers > > Koz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-core%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- Ryan Bigg / Radar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
