Doesn't he have a point? Shouldn't Rails' asset tag helper(s) be changed accordingly?
http://github.com/eliotsykes/asset_fingerprint Quote (http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/caching.html): Recommendations Don't include a query string in the URL for static resources. Most proxies, most notably Squid up through version 3.0, do not cache resources with a "?" in their URL even if a Cache-control: public header is present in the response. To enable proxy caching for these resources, remove query strings from references to static resources, and instead encode the parameters into the file names themselves. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
