On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Stefan Lang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/11/15 Andrew Kaspick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> The pg gem is what you should be using now.
>
> postgres-pr was easier to deploy - put it in vendor
> and be done. Building a C extension on/for the server
> can be a hassle.
>
> And neither pg nor ruby-postgres build with Ruby 1.9.
>
> What was the reason for dropping postgres-pr support,
> and what needs to be done to make it work again?

It wasn't intentionally dropped. It doesn't implement the
#transaction_status method.

Upgrade to the latest postgres-pr, which has this method, and you'll
be back up and running.

Also, the C drivers have worked with 1.9 since January 2008.

Best,
jeremy

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to