Will do! Thanks for the feedback. - Ken
On Nov 4, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > Rails core decided long ago that it will not host adapters (other > than ones currently in). > > So, separate repo +1 > You will have more control. > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 17:47, Rich Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would vote for having a dedicated 'official' repo. It would help > sort out which version is the 'one'. > > Rich C. > > On 11/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > A few of us are putting some finishing touches on the latest SQL > > Server adapter and plan to have it ready for a rails 2.2 release. My > > question is should we create a new github account that would be the > > official repo for it or is there a possibility that it can be hosed > > under the /rails as a project with a group of us added as > > collaborators? > > > > It would see to me the easiest thing maint wise would be to create > our > > own official space on github vs the disparate repos we have now, but > > thought I would ask. > > > > > > - Ken > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
