Apart from my assurances that the InterBase adapter will not fall into disrepair, I'm not sure what else I can provide.
Is InterBase in wide production use or InterBase on Rails? Not on Rails as I have only distributed it as a patch - after it has been extensively tested and used. It is certainly a whole lot better than the Firebird and ostensibly, SQL Server adapters, I use it continually myself, one of the core systems for product pricing management at Codegear (who own InterBase) will run on Rails (when I finish it). Do you do work with Nahum in Wellington? You can ask him about it. Thanks Richard On 1/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What does it take to get new database support into ActiveRecord? I have > had > > my InterBase patch on the patch list for a month now (I updated it on > 23/12) > > and there has been no activity... It is extremely well tested, is there > a > > stop on adding more databases to ActiveRecord? Is the plan to get people > to > > fork of 1.2 and make it available to people? > > Once concern with new adapters is that they tend to fall into > disrepair, the best way to alleviate that concern is to setup a > continuous integration system as the oracle and sql server adapters > has. > > But another concern is how widely will it be used, have you > distributed this adapter as a plugin? Are there many production > applications in use? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
