Works fine, thanks ! V.
On 07.12.23 12:04, Simon Rit wrote:
If you're using Cuda, you'll probably need itkCudaComon-5.4.dll too. But in general, I think it's easier and safer to manage all this with CMake following the FirstReconstruction example <https://github.com/RTKConsortium/RTK/tree/master/examples/FirstReconstruction/>.Simon On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:34 AM Vincent Libertiaux <v...@xris.eu> wrote: Yes, I have the same. What puzzled me is that I already had the itkRTK-5.2 on top of the all the others. If you can confirm this is the only one I need to link against in my GUI, I am all good ! Thank you again, V. On 07.12.23 11:27, Simon Rit wrote:Ok. On my Windows box which compiles RTK nightly with Ninja and MSVC 2019, the libs are in the bin folder and called itkRTK-5.4.dll and bin/itkCudaCommon-5.4.dll. Maybe the itk prefix is new? On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:23 AM Vincent Libertiaux <v...@xris.eu> wrote: Hi Simon, I tried on Windows 10 and 11, with Visual Studio 2019. I compile ITK and RTK jointly, with the cuda option on. I tried building both static and dynamic libraries and just static ones, the result is the same. I have no warning in CMAKE or in Visual Studio. Thank you for your time, V. On 07.12.23 11:13, Simon Rit wrote:Hi, I'm not sure, I guess there is if you see a difference! Can you tell us more about the operating system and the compiler? Do you compile ITK first and then RTK or both jointly? Simon On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vincent Libertiaux <v...@xris.eu> wrote: Hello ! I have built a GUI around RTK with ITK 5.2 module and everything works fine. I wanted to upgrade to ITK 5.3 ( I also tried with ITK 5.4 with the same results) and for some reasons, not all the rtk*.lib (located in the Build/lib folder) are generated. I only have 3 of them with the 5.3 and 0 with the 5.4. All my CMake options were the same than for the compilation of version 5.2, namely building shared and static libraries. The applications (rtkfdk, rtkprojections,...) work fine. I looked into the CMakeLists files but couldn't really find any useful information. Is there any significant difference in the *lib generation after ITK v 5.2 ?? I thank you in advance for any help you can provide ! Best regards, Vincent _______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list rtk-us...@openrtk.org https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list rtk-us...@openrtk.org https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list rtk-us...@openrtk.org https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list rtk-us...@openrtk.org https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
