Hi Acee, thank you for sharing your comments and suggestions. Please find my notes below tagged GIM>>.
Regards, Greg On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:07 PM Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > As requested by the chairs, I'm reposting my RTGWG comments on this draft. > > Like the other draft, I'd like to hear about your use cases for deployment > of more than 3 VRRP routers for the same Virtual Router (same LAN segment > and VRID). > GIM>> Is there any limitation or a recomendation in Operational Consideration in RFC 9568 for the number of VRRP routers in the given VRID? > > This draft requires implementation of P2MP BFD (RFC 8562) as a > pre-requisite. Who has implemented this draft? GIM>> In the course of publishing RFC 8562, at least one released implementation was noted. As for the draft, to the best of my knowledge, PoC was completed. > > > The draft shouldn't need to modify the VRRP packets. Given the P2MP BFD > and its applicability to a Virtual Router needs to be enabled on the > participating VRRP routers, you shouldn't need to modify the VRRP > encodings. The BFD encapsulation in the draft can be used and the Virtual > Router can be determined by the IPv4/IPv6 source address. If RFC 8562 > requires the descriminator, it could configured or your document could > modify RFC 8562 to avoid bastardizing BFD. GIM>> That is an interesting suggestion; thank you. Will look into constructing My Discriminator using VRID. > Note that other protocols using BFD for fast failure detection do not > require BFD information to be advertised in the protocol packets (e.g., > OSPF and IS-IS). GIM>> AFAIK, IGPs use respective extensions to advertise My Discriminator for use in Seamless BFD (RFC 7880). Does that count as BFD-related information advertised by the IGP? > > > The draft in under specified as it doesn't include of the additions need > to the RFC 9568 pseudo code specifications. However, I REALLY don't want to > see any additions to section 7. GIM>> The intention of the proposal is to have no impact on Section 7 of RFC 9568. Am I missing something here? > > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
