Dear All, As noted in the RTGWG meeting at IETF-122, two WG documents describe BFD-based solutions in support of faster convergence in the VRRP environment. Although both drafts use BFD mechanisms, these mechanisms are significantly distinct, resulting in very different modifications to the RFC 9568 VRRPv3 specification required by each solution. At some point in the past, a single draft documents both solutions. Since the solutions split, it seems that draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd/> has evolved and is now ready for the WG LC. Hence, the question to the WG:
- Do you object to maintaining and publishing separate documents that document BFD-based solutions in support of faster VRRP convergence? Regards, Greg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
