Hi Tom,
thank you for your help in clarifying the scope of the draft. Please find
several notes below tagged GIM>> (not on the proposed mechanism but rather
on the general aspects of protection and redundancy).

Regards,
Greg

On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 2:14 AM tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:

> Abstract is too short - it fails to tell me whether or not I want to read
> further.
>
> Perhaps
>
>    Current IP network protection mechanisms can be divided into
>    local protection and end-to-end protection. Local protection
>    technologies, such as ECMP and TI-LFA, can only detect local failures
> and
>   then  perform fast reroute.

GIM>> Althtough the list odesn't have to be exaustive, we may add FRR per
RFC 4090.

>
>
>    End-to-end protection technologies are usually
>    targeted at end-to-end TE paths, where the head-end detects TE path
>    failures and performs a rapid switchover.
>
GIM>> Indeed, the described behavior is characteristic to N:M protection.
In some scenarios, redundant path may be used in 1+1 protection scheme.
Then, it is the tail-end that detects the failure and switches to the
backup path.

>
>    There is no mechanism quickly to detect remote failures and invoke
>    repairs for non-TE paths.

GIM>> Ain't you excluding multi-hop BFD?

>
>
>    This document proposes a framework for a path-aware, remote protection
>     mechanism for non-TE paths.
>
> with the abbreviations expanded as appropriate (but - of course - no
> references!).
>
> HTH
>
> Tom Petch
>
> ________________________________________
> From: linchangwang <linchangwang.04...@h3c.com>
> Sent: 18 October 2024 15:13
> To: RTGWG; rtgwg-chairs
> Subject: Request for MORE reviews of
> draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection-02
>
> Dear All,
>
> Since the last presentation, we have added a detailed description of path
> information at both the per-neighbor and per-link levels in this draft.
> We've also included two co-authors from Juniper and Broadcom.
>
> Current IP network protection mechanisms are mainly divided into local
> protection and end-to-end protection. There is no mechanism to quickly
> detect remote failures and initiate repairs for non-TE paths.
>
> The draft is simple and straightforward; it proposes a path-aware remote
> protection mechanism and outlines its framework.
> This includes the control plane, forwarding plane for remote path
> awareness,
>  and a rapid notification framework for remote failures, which can be
> applied to quick switching in a spine-leaf architecture.
>
> More reviews and comments are welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Changwang
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> 发送时间: 2024年9月14日 14:11
> 收件人: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> 主题: I-D Action: draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection-02.txt
>
> Internet-Draft draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection-02.txt is now
> available.
>
>    Title:   Path-aware Remote Protection Framework
>    Authors: Yisong Liu
>             Changwang Lin
>             Mengxiao Chen
>             Zheng Zhang
>             Kevin Wang
>             Zongying He
>    Name:    draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection-02.txt
>    Pages:   16
>    Dates:   2024-09-13
>
> Abstract:
>
>    This document describes the framework of path-aware remote
>    protection.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection/
>
> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection-02
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-liu-rtgwg-path-aware-remote-protection-02
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list -- i-d-annou...@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an
> email to i-d-announce-le...@ietf.org
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
> 的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
> 或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
> 邮件!
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New
> H3C, which is
> intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any
> use of the
> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
> total or partial
> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
> intended
> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender
> by phone or email immediately and delete it!
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to