Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-41: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this document.

I don't comments from transport protocol aspects, however, I have following
observations which I believe will improve the document when addressed -

# Section 3.4 : this section need to relate the listed issues to networking
problem. It says -

       1) The difference in routing distances to server instances in
          different edge Clouds is relatively small. Therefore, the
          instance in the Edge Cloud with the shortest routing distance
          from a 5G UPF might not be the best in providing the overall
          low latency service.

     So, this becomes mainly resource selection issue as routng distance is not
     an issue.

       2) Capacity status at the Edge Cloud might play a more
          significant role in end-to-end performance.

     Again not sure how this becomes networking issue.

       3) Source (UEs) can ingress from different LDN Ingress routers
          due to mobility.

     Does the routing distance become a issue now?

# Section 3.4 : I also think the text is speculative regarding CATS WG and may
be unnecessary as [METADATA-PATH] is already solving the issues.

# Section 3.6 : is there any generic way to solve the NAT related issue listed
or will it be always Cloud operator specific configuration?



_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to