Hi all, I have a question about usage of BGP policies for "typed" SAFI in MP-BGP.
These days there are already quite a few "typed" SAFI, i.e., SAFI in which the NLRI of the route includes the route type followed by the type-specific data. Known cases include: * MCAST-VPN [RFC6514<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6514>] * MCAST-VPLS [RFC7117<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7117>] * EVPN [RFC7432<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432>] * BGP-LS [RFC7752<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7752>] * CAR [Color-aware routing draft<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-10>]. It seems that the current definitions of BGP policies (e.g., see the BGP YANG Model<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-17> draft) do not provide ability to define conditions that would, when applied to a specific SAFI with "typed" NLRI, identify NLRI of specific type. One example could be a rule that would be applied to EVPN Type 5 (IP Prefix) routes and check their destination IP Prefix bin the same way destination IP prefixes can be checked for, say, VPNv4 or VPNv6 routes. I wonder if the corresponding extension would be of any interest to the WG. Regards, and lots of thanks in advance, Sasha Disclaimer This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
