While reviewing a different document that uses a similar “aims at“ construction, it occurred to me that,
On Apr 16, 2024, at 4:14 PM, John Scudder via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: Segment Routing aims at supporting services with tight SLA guarantees [RFC8402]. … If you had written this slightly differently, I wouldn’t have had quite the same reaction. Specifically, if you had supplied the reference immediately after “Segment Routing,” as in, Segment Routing [RFC8402] aims at supporting services with tight SLA guarantees. I wouldn’t have had the same “but that isn’t what RFC 8402 says at all“ response. I suggest that change as a minimum edit. I continue to prefer my original suggestion of simply deleting the sentence, though, since it doesn’t seem to add anything to the specification. [1] —John [ 1] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/19905-perfection-is-achieved-not-when-there-is-nothing-more-to
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
