Hi, I have two questions:
1. Draft says that triggering the action is an event which in defined by configuration: "configured troubleshooting triggering condition." If so that only covers very small subset of possible anomalies. Moreover this would only cover anomalies which are known apriori. 2. The draft focuses on control plane troubleshooting. Well most protocols have build in mechanisms for that. Instead most interesting failures are happening not in control plane but in data plane. So do you plan to refocus or add ability to self trigger actions based on various data plane events ? Many thx, Robert On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 7:25 AM tanzhen (A) <tanzhen6= 40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hi Yingzhen, > > > I would like to request a 10 minute slot for Protocol Assisted Protocol > (PASP) draft： > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rtgwg-protocol-assisted-protocol/ An > updated version of this draft will be uploaded later this week. Presenter: > Zhen Tan > > Thanks. > > Zhen > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
