Dear All,
This version addresses all IESG review comments. -- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:40 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]>; Uma Chunduri <[email protected]>; Hannes Gredler <[email protected]>; Pushpasis Sarkar <[email protected]>; Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-09.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-09.txt has been successfully submitted by Uma Chunduri and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa Revision: 09 Title: Loop-Free Alternates selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes Document date: 2018-11-21 Group: rtgwg Pages: 18 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-09.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-09 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-09 Abstract: Deployment experience gained from implementing algorithms to determine Loop-Free Alternates (LFAs) for multi-homed prefixes has revealed some avenues for potential improvement. This document provides explicit inequalities that can be used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi-homed prefixes. It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs. This documents updates and expands some of the "Routing Aspects" as specified in Section 6 of RFC 5286. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
