Hi Ben
>ยง9: "Existing OSPF security considerations and stronger authentication
and manual key management mechanisms are specified in [RFC7474] SHOULD be
considered for OSPF deployments."
>Could this say something stronger than "SHOULD be considered"? I'm
fine with the SHOULD part, but simply considering it may not be that helpful.
Ack. and this is addressed as part of the updated text for security
considerations as given by security AD Benjamin (Thx!) as part of his comments.
--
Uma C.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
