Looks good. Thanks!
/a
On 2/13/18 11:10 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Adam,
The -10 version includes IPv6 addresses in the examples. Note that OSPF
router-ids and area-ids are represented in dotted-quad format but are not
necessarily IPv4 addresses (although it is common for the unique router-id to
be based on an IPv4 loopback address).
Thanks,
Acee
On 2/8/18, 12:25 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Adam Roach" <[email protected] on
behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the examples in §B.1 use IPv4 addresses exclusively. Please update these
to use all-IPv6 or a mix of IPv4 and IPv6. See
<https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/> for details.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
