Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- As several others have noted, the major concerns below from the Gen-ART reviewer need to be addressed: Section 4 listed three data nodes that are sensitive or vulnerable: - /logical-network-elements/logical-network-element - /logical-network-elements/logical-network-element/managed - /if:interfaces/if:interface/bind-lne-name All three of them deserve a bit more discussion, although the middle one is covered in much more detail than the other two. If a bad actor gets "unauthorized access" is there something more specific about each of these that can be said? The characterization of "network malfunctions, delivery of packets to inappropriate destinations, and other problems" seems very broad. Consequences that are specific to these data nodes would be more helpful to the reader. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
