Hi Radek, I believe I have addressed your YANG Doctor comments in the -05 version of the draft. I used the template in RFC6087Bis, Appendix C which resulted in some reorganization of ietf-routing-types.
Thanks, Acee On 5/24/17, 6:45 AM, "Radek Krejčí" <[email protected]> wrote: >Reviewer: Radek Krejčí >Review result: Ready with Nits > >I have reviewed changes made to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types between >revision 02 and 04 (04 was published just a week after 03). The main >change is splitting the module into 2 modules: ietf-routing-types and >iana-routing-types. > >iana-routing-types: >- since it is IANA-maintained module, IANA should be the 'organization' >and also the 'contact' value should be changed accordingly (see >iana-if-type) > >ietf-routing-types: >- please follow the contact template available in RFC 6087 Appendix B (or >RFC6087bis, Appendix C) > >draft text: >- if iana-routing-types is supposed to be IANA-maintained module, isn't >IANA also supposed to be XML registrant contact (IANA Considerations >section)? >- my fault from previous review - since the module imports >ietf-yang-types, it MUST contain reference to its RFC, which is RFC 6991 >(not RFC 6021 as I wrote in my review). So move RFC 6991 reference from >Informative references section into Normative references where it will >replace reference to RFC 6021. > >Radek _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
