Mirja, On 4/25/17, 2:45 AM, "Mirja Kühlewind" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-20: No Objection > >When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >introductory paragraph, however.) > > >Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > >The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/ > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >COMMENT: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Fully editorial comment: >section 1 is just a copy of the abstract… this could be removed and >section 2 could be used as section 1/intro (with sections 1.1, 1.2, and >2.1 as subsections; and section 2.2. could become the new section 2) I’m declining the comment. The “Abstract” and “Introduction” serve entirely different purposes and are not always read in succession. For one thing, the latter includes the actual document references. Thanks, Acee > > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
