Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a couple of editorial comments: -2.2: "This MAY be accomplished by accepting all the keys that have a valid accept lifetime and sending the key with the most recent send lifetime." As written, that MAY sounds like a statement of fact rather than a normative requirement. If it's intended as normative, please consider restating in terms of actual procedure (e.g. "The receiver MAY accept ...") -3, first paragraph: "Is a "key chain key" a key in the keychain, or something else? (maybe a key _for_ the keychain)? _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
