Hi, Jonathan Hardwick asked me to do an early review of the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp document (currently revision 02) for the routing directorate.
The draft itself is pretty straight forward and compact, especially when you consider that a lot of text has to be repeated two or four times (IPv4/IPv6, config vs. read-only state). But I had quite a bit of trouble mapping the phrases from the new draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-02 document to the existing VRRP documents (e.g. RFC5798). This might come from my unfamilarity with VRRP. The draft YANG model allows to read (if:interfaces-state) and configure (if:interfaces) virtual IP addresses, but this does not seem to be a common phrase from the RFCs. Is it the same as "address of the virtual router" often mentioned in RFC5798? In addition to this, I found (I think) a typo or inconsistency in Appendix A: the ascii art says "eth0" but tree says "eth1". Henning Rogge On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Hardwick < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Henning > > > > Please would you do a routing directorate early review of this draft? > Would you be able to do it in 2 to 3 weeks? > > > > Many thanks > > Jon > > > > > > Please would you do a routing directorate QA review of this draft? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ > > > > The draft is still in the RTGWG and is ready for WG last call. The WG > chairs have asked for a QA review from the directorate. The following link > provides guidance on QA reviews. > > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/rtg/wiki/RtgDirDocQa > > > > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
