I'm in favor.
> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> wrote: > > RTGWG, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01 as a working group document. > > “Destination/Source Routing” > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/> > > As was discussed in Prague, this draft is needed to support work in homenet. > It is outside of the scope of homenet’s charter, but within the scope of > RTGWG’s charter. > > Please send comments to the list and state your support or opposition to > RTGWG adoption of this draft. > > This poll runs through the end of Monday, September 7th. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this > email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response > needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to > the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each > individual that has contributed to the document. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
